Current-state architecture
Capture the current environment, dependencies, constraints and operating risks so decisions about current-state architecture are based on what actually exists.
Gromnii connects business priorities to target architecture, investment choices and transformation sequencing.
Use technology strategy and enterprise architecture when major investments, platform choices or modernization programs depend on understanding current systems and their dependencies. Architecture work should make tradeoffs and sequencing clear enough to guide real decisions.
Capture the current environment, dependencies, constraints and operating risks so decisions about current-state architecture are based on what actually exists.
Describe the target state in terms of responsibilities, information flows, interfaces, transition steps and measurable constraints.
Assign owners for capability and dependency mapping, including responsibility for changes and operational response.
Write architecture principles as practical decision rules, including when an exception is acceptable and who can approve it.
Connect Roadmap and investment logic to the evidence and constraints that justify a technology choice.
Connect technology dependencies, business priorities and risk so initiatives are ordered by what must happen first.
Define architecture principles and ownership so teams do not solve the same problem with incompatible technologies without a reason.
Show how the current environment can move toward the target state through practical intermediate steps rather than an unrealistic end-state diagram.
Define which technology decisions belong to product teams, platform owners, security, finance or architecture so choices are made at the right level of authority.
Compare options against explicit criteria such as reliability, security, cost, delivery effort and reversibility so architecture decisions remain explainable after the project moves on.
Make dependencies an explicit governance and operating decision with an owner, review point and clear effect on sequencing or investment choices.
Use lightweight review for material cross-system decisions, record the rationale and revisit it when assumptions change rather than creating permanent approval boards for routine work.
This reference shows one possible Technology Strategy and Enterprise Architecture arrangement. The actual design depends on the systems, constraints and controls involved.
Describe what Technology Strategy and Enterprise Architecture should change, the systems it must work with and the constraints that matter.